Blair,
thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, the altered syntax does not work. Like I said earlier, we've have that problem for a long while know, using all kinds of SPSS and ML versions. I believe that SPSS supports longer varnames since Version 12. Anyway, I used the original syntax, I altered it, I tried to vary the string variable length and it simple won't work (using data generated by the latest ML and using actual (14 or 15) version of SPSS).
The result (which basically looks the same every time) is attached. What I don't get is why it works if it is run by ML or whatever you do that generates the data files. The ML generated sav-files all look perfectly fine (despite the embedded space; the only consequence is a spss generated varname var0001 or so...). BUT if I try to do it myself (after I merged txt-files from different PCs), it won't work.
As a result I have to add data/cases via SPSS. It would be much more comfortable, if it was possible just to read in the (already merged) raw data!
You see, the read in/syntax and the string variable problems are independant...
Thanks again,
Rene